Gov’t Filches Millions From Its Senior Citizens 

Ocean County Observer

November 13, 1978

 

 

There has been much ado about rising medical and health costs during the past decade, but little has been said about the Medicare managers and how they work prodigiously to reduce health care costs.  Since Medicare in the Title XVIII of the Social Security Act which is responsible for meeting out funds for illness, it seems paradoxial that this same agency could be feted for actually saving the government money.

 

But they do, by having sharp-eyed clerks ferret out ways they can shortchange these who are issued by Medicare.

 

I sought my friend, Chisholm in the Medicare office to find out about all this.

 

“Are these rumors true?” I asked, “That Prudential is saving millions on health bills by carefully perusing each case and cutting out the excess monies that patients believe are due them?”

 

“Probably true,” Chisholm replied.  “After subtracting our costs there probably is a substantial profit for the government and that means for the taxpayer.”

 

“But Chisholm,” I remonstrated, “You might save a few pennies for each taxpayer, but at the cost of depriving the sick person dollars, maybe even a hundred dollars.”

 

“Well, a penny saved is a penny earned,” Chisholm replied brightly.

 

“But is it just?” I asked.  “For instance, this very year I won several cases against Medicare for my patients which they couldn’t possibly have won for themselves, being neither lawyers nor doctors.  I mean the issues are very complicated, and the medical matters must be interpreted in the light of Medicare law.  What makes it more difficult is that you are never discussing the case with a doctor, but with some clerks.  No doctors ever see the cases, but continue to discuss the issues through the mails, even long after the patient is dead.  They never give up, Chisholm.”

 

“But the patient is entitled to a fair hearing, why do you have to get involved?” Chisholm asked.

 

“Because the fair hearing isn’t very fair,” I replied heatedly.

 

“Tut, tut, how can you say that?” Chisholm sounded offended.

 

“Easy,” I replied, taking out the latest letter from Prudential which providently had landed on my desk that morning.  “They or you, or Medicare or Prudential, or whoever it is that I am arguing the case with, insists that they have had their own medical staff review the charts, and that their opinion is that the allowances are fair and equitable.  Then they offer me a fair hearing.  What is a fair hearing, but a contest between me and my patient against Medicare, or Prudential, or whoever, before a Hearing Officer, who is a member of the Prudential or Medicare or whoever’s staff.  They tell me I can bring a lawyer.  They also add that no claim for less than $100 will be allowed a fair hearing.  Do you have any idea, Chisholm, how many millions – nay hundreds of millions – dare I say billions, the government can filch from its senior citizens by denying 50 bucks here and 30 bucks there?”

 

“Yup, it’s a lot of money,” Chisholm said, smacking his lips.