Insurer ‘Threatens’ Hospital

Daily Observer

December 15, 1975

 

            We have increasingly in the theater of the absurd, except the term might properly be modified to the medical amphitheater of the absurd.  The insurance company that carries the liability insurance for the Community Memorial Hospital is anxious to divest itself of that business.  Its contract runs until June 1976.  But it has threatened the hospital that its insurance will dropped within 10 days unless the hospital removes the stretchers from the hall.

            The patients lie in stretchers in the hall because there are not enough beds to cater to the medical needs of the community.  Stretchers in the hall obviously are an infraction of hospital building codes or at least of fire codes.  Of course they could put stretchers outside the building, but chances are that they would catch another code.

            If the hospital loses its liability insurance, it will have to close its doors, which would leave the area bereft of hospital facilities.

            If the hospital complies and removes beds from the hallways, it would have no beds in which to place emergencies that are brought to the emergency rooms by the rescue squads.  The danger of illness and accidents will thus be compounded.

            The hospital probably cannot close its emergency room and still retain its charter as a hospital.  It cannot build new beds without a certificate of need from state agencies.  If the hospital does close its emergency room, doctors will be unable to care for their patients.  Patients will have to shift for themselves to find hospital accommodations unless some unified plan between hospitals in the area is developed.  The area hospitals which managed to unite in order to sue the state to give them the per diem rates they wanted have, so far, not been able, or perhaps not tried, to develop a unifying plan that would enable the sick to find hospital accommodations in one of the area hospitals.  In this modern age of instant communications and computerization, that incapability seems odd, to say the least.

            The health system, therefore, must be repaired, or reconstituted to fill the needs of the people.  The thrust of legal encumbrances that prohibit the construction of new hospital beds by communities, such as Brick, is in reality an administrative dictatorship that prevents communities from doing what they feel is best for them.

            Worst of all, of course, is that the federal and state regulations are so well hidden from public view that we the people have little knowledge of what is happening to us or why.

            There is a terrible fear amongst our leaders that we will waste money on our health.  I can’t think of a better thing to waste it on.

            There is fear that there will be empty hospital beds.  That is certainly healthier than no hospital beds.  And finally, there is fear…..