The Role of Health Organizations

Daily Observer

April 25, 1975

 

            S.Q. Lapius awakened me early.  He was already dressed.  He had taken the trouble to put on his gray striped cashmere, replete with vest, across which he had threaded a gold chain from which the gold honor society keys dangled.  “Come Harry.  We are going to the state capital to testify before an August body.”

            I dressed quickly, and we were off.  “It seems strange,” I noted.  “The sun is just rising.  What sir, may I ask, is the purpose of the trip?  What August body?  And furthermore, might I ask, why don’t you learn to drive, so that I won’t be encumbered with your chores.”

            “The August body decides medical matters at the state capital; the purpose of the trip to try to make points there; and I haven’t learned to drive precisely because I have you.”

            The August body at the state capital convened in an elegant paneled room, high polish and walnut, with shiny desks and imposing podium and bench where the state gods of medical matters sat importantly in magisterial robes.  Lapius was apparently only one of a number of witnesses, but after some humdrum beginnings, I breathed a sigh of relief when I learned that he would be the first to make testimony, render advice, or whatever his purpose there was.

            Dr. Snodgrass seemed to be the chief inquisitor, in the seat of high honor on the podium.  He gathered his robes solemnly.  “The purpose of this hearing is to determine the future of the health maintenance organizations.  For this purpose we have gathered distinguished witnesses, doctors, community members, to hold a hearing that will help the legislature determine whether the health maintenance organization should be written into law.”

            Lapius leaned towards me.  “It took all the forbearance at my command to keep from flunking Snodgrass when he was a student of mine.  Now look at him.  Never a day in practice, deciding the medical needs of the community.”

            Snodgrass nodded towards Lapius, introduced him, and asked Lapius if he were prepared to make a statement.  Lapius stood up, opened his coat to bare the glistening gold medallions that adorned his vest, and bowed slightly.  “Yes,” Lapius said, “I have a brief statement.”

            I sat back and closed my eyes.  A brief statement by Lapius was usually on the order of a doctoral dissertation.  It would be a long morning, I figured.  Lapius was speaking.

            “First, of course, it should be made clear that Health Maintenance Organizations are what we know as HMO’s.  They have a place in the community.  But I fear that you, Dr. Snodgrass, and I, will not agree on where that place is.  The idea, of course, is some sort of prepayment concept, where patients can for a predetermined sum, procure an assortment of medical services from a medical corporation.  They can have periodic testing, diagnostic screening, medical care, hospitalization and so forth.  I am not sure that this will be more beneficial than the current modes of practice, although it does limit the out of pocket expenses for medical care.  It has the advantages of an insurance plan.  Its purpose is to provide an incentive for abbreviating hospitalization, because the corporation will go bankrupt if it must meet excessive hospital bills.”

            “My objection of course, is that the length of hospital stay must be dictated solely by the condition of the patient, and that fiscal considerations have no place there.  I also object to the HMO because it becomes an instrument to use the profession of medicine to hide the failure of the government, or the economic system, which cannot run its affairs so that everybody will be able to afford proper medical care.  Governments have a tendency to do this.  They spend billions of dollars wastefully then when it comes to their attention that there are inequities in our society, instead of correcting their own abuses of the system, they try to bastardize institutions such as the medical profession to make up for their own shortcomings.”  I would have no objection if I believed that this would solve the problem; but I do not think HMO’s are the answer necessarily.”

            Snodgrass leaned down from his bench on high.  “Then I am to understand, Dr. Lapius, that you believe HMO’s have no place in our society?”

            “Quite the contrary.  They do have a place,” said Simon, “but not the same place that you would have them.”

            “I am confused,” Snodgrass admitted.

            Lapius smiled.  “Well then permit me to clarify.  I don’t believe that the cost-benefit ratio of HMO’s in the general community would prove advantageous.  Where the HMO concept could play an important role is not so much in the general community but rather in the nursing home.  It is here that periodic screening for anemia, blood chemistries, urinary infection and the like would be very helpful.  After all, the younger people of a community develop symptoms when they become ill and go to a doctor.  Almost invariably early cases of hypertension are detected and treated.  Diabetes causes uncomfortable symptoms, and patients seek care.  There is no proof that HMO’s have increased longevity by early detection of tumors.  The point is, that the working members of the community seek medical care when they develop symptoms, and the system accounts for that.

            “But nursing home inhabitants are a different matter.  Here the patients are old, possibly senile, often suffering incurable chronic disease; perhaps paralyzed, unable to communicate.  They develop their diseases silently and without fanfare.  They do not react as violently to infection as the younger people do.  They accept pain more stoically or perhaps they do not feel it as sharply among their other aches as the young.  In short, illness in the elderly is surreptitious, and their state of health could best be maintained by screening techniques proposed for the HMO’s.”

            “But”, Snodgrass interpose, “The convalescent homes and nursing homes are not structured for the HMO concept, legally, that is.”

            “I appreciate that,” said Lapius, “But they should be.  It is there that your money would be the best spent.”

            “But it would be impossible.  The charters would have to be changed.  After all the doctor-patient relationship would be disrupted.”

            Lapius snorted, “Please don’t shed your crocodile tears for the doctor-patient relationship.  You seem to have no objections to disrupting it by disseminating HMO’s throughout the community.  But when it comes to the nursing homes, where the doctor-patient relationship is much more tenuous because the institution itself is parentis-in-loco and is truly an intermediary between the doctor and the patient, you suddenly become sanctimonious.  I will reiterate my position but once.”

            “If you want to test the HMO concept, the best place to try it out, the area of easiest surveillance and greatest return, would be the nursing home.  It would not interfere with the relationship between doctor and patient.  It would preempt merely one area, that is periodic screening of pertinent parameters of patient care.  The results would be forwarded to the doctor who would then be alerted to respond with appropriate remedial measures.”

            “What you propose will, of course, be taken under consideration, but the proposals were not the topic of the day.  Thank you anyway for coming.”

            Lapius bowed again and sat down.  He gathered his papers into his brief case and tugged at my arm.  “If we leave now, we might be home by noon.”

            It was, nevertheless, a long drive home.